Skip to Main Content

Artificial Intelligence

This guide was written by staff of the TJU libraries and of the Office for Professional Writing, Publication, and Communication to aid your exploration of AI as a tool for education, research, and lifelong learning.

AI in Higher Education

ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Quick Start Guide (by Emma Sabzalieva and Arianna Valentini, UNESCO, April 2023) "raises some of the main challenges and ethical implications of AI in higher education and offers practical steps that higher education institutions can take." The guide [page 9] suggests these teaching and learning applications of ChatGPT in higher education:

possibility engine Socratic opponent collaboration coach
guide on the side personal tutor co-designer
exploratorium study buddy motivator

AI Tools

Would you like a writing and a grading assistant?

Packback is an AI tool available through Thomas Jefferson University and accessible through your course on Canvas. Packback offers 3 different tools to help students enhance their writing and critical thinking, and assists instructors with grading these assignments.

Would you like to create images?

Would you like help organizing your "to do" list, changing the tone of your writing, judging the tone of someone else's text, or estimating how long a task will take?

Are you grappling with understanding a reading?

Would you like to convert text to speech (TTS)?

Do you need help coding?


If you are considering using generative AI in research and writing, ask yourself, "When is it safe to use ChatGPT?"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Quick Start Guide  by Emma Sabzalieva and Arianna Valentini, UNESCO, 2023. Flowchart by Aleksandr Tiulkanov, January 2023, p. 6.

For Instructors

Syllabi statements

AI Prompting

Pedagogy

Guidance on using AI for writing assignments

TJU has not yet determined an institutional position on student use of AI. Instructors are encouraged to clearly state their own AI use policies in their course syllabi while also upholding the university's policy on academic dishonesty and plagiarism. That policy, as outlined in the TJU Handbook, states:

"Academic integrity is the foundation of all Jefferson teaching, learning, and professional endeavors and is vital to advancing a culture of fairness, trust and respect. All members of the University community must maintain respect for the intellectual efforts of others and be honest in their own work, words and ideas... Plagiarism: The intentional use of another person's language, ideas, or other original (not common-knowledge) material without acknowledging its source; engaging and incorporating the exact or closely paraphrased ideas, words, data, or images of others without consent and/or citation to the author. This includes text and images produced by AI tools without instructor permission or proper citation."

Model guidelines for AI in higher education 

Embracing vs Restricting

AI is increasingly integrated into various aspects of our lives, offering solutions to a wide range of problems. Consequently, the question arises: should educational institutions maintain strict zero-tolerance policies towards AI in coursework? The concept of 'AI detectors' designed to identify AI-generated content within student submissions has gained attention. However, research suggests these detectors can be prone to inaccuracies, often mistaking human writing for AI-generated text and vice versa. While platforms like Turnitin offer AI detection features for instructors, their efficacy remains imperfect. According to the chief product officer, inconsistencies persist, and no detector can guarantee 100% accuracy in identifying AI usage in writing.

This poses a challenge for educators navigating the landscape of AI integration in classrooms, whether students openly acknowledge its use or not. Turnitin offers these resources to help instructors address this issue and to guide students in responsible AI utilization: